Average Bench: 24.4% (132nd of 649)

Based on 38,740 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 67FF Models: Radeon RX 560, AMD Radeon (TM) RX 560, Radeon(TM) RX 560 Graphics, AMD Radeon(TM) RX 560, ASUS Radeon RX 560

The Radeon RX 560 is third in the line up of AMD’s second generation Polaris GPUs aimed at the entry-level 1080p gaming market with a sub-$100 launch price, due for release in May 2017. It is the successor to the now nine month old RX 460. Like the RX 460, it is based on Polaris 11, but comes with all 16 compute units enabled (2 more than in the 460). Coupled with a 6% improvement in boost clock speed from 1200MHz to 1275MHz, a minimum increase in overall effective speed of 10% against the 460 is anticipated. The RX 560 is fresh competition to NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 in terms of price and performance. User benchmarks reveal that NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 is faster than the RX 460 by 17% and so it is expected that the 560 will close most, if not all, of that gap. [May '17 GPUPro]

Very poor average bench

The AMD RX 560 averaged 75.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 83.8fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 89.8fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD RX 560 is just 5.61%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD RX 560 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 79.6fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 120fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 38,740 samples)
Min Avg Max
0.3 Lighting 83.8 102
73.4 Reflection 79.6 85.7
105 Parallax 120 138
22% 94.6 fps
Min Avg Max
60.1 MRender 63.9 67.5
77.8 Gravity 89.8 101
72.1 Splatting 78 82.3
24.7% 77.3 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Asus(1043 04BE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1326 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Lighting 97.4
Reflection 88.7
Parallax 142
26% 109 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 97.4
Splatting 82.5
27% 82.5 fps
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Lighting 86.5
Reflection 79.3
Parallax 118
23% 94.4 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 89.1
Splatting 77
24% 76.4 fps
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Lighting 87.1
Reflection 77.3
Parallax 117
23% 93.9 fps
MRender 62.6
Gravity 87.8
Splatting 78
24% 76.1 fps
PowerColor(148C 2381) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Lighting 82.4
Reflection 76.8
Parallax 126
22% 95 fps
MRender 62.7
Gravity 84.6
Splatting 77.3
23% 74.9 fps
Asus(1043 052D) 2GB
CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Lighting 79.3
Reflection 77.3
Parallax 104
21% 87 fps
MRender 59.4
Gravity 80.7
Splatting 74.8
22% 71.6 fps
38,740 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 34,836,927 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 38,740 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (Approx. $100 @ launch in May '17)
MSI(1462 8A91) 30% 24% ± 1%
MSI RX 560 4GB Aero ITX
RX 560 AERO ITX 4G OC
AmazonDE €13821 days
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) 21% 25% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 22FF) 8% 24% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 230A) 6% 22% ± 1%
XFX(1682 9560) 5% 26% ± 1%
Asus(1043 04BC) 5% 25% ± 1%
Asus(1043 04BE) 5% 27% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 22ED) 4% 27% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0531) 4% 24% ± 1%
Asus(1043 052D) 3% 24% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 22FB) 3% 27% ± 1%
PowerColor(148C 2381) 1% 22% ± 1%
Asus(1043 052F) 1% 24% ± 0%
AMD(1002 0B04) 1% 24% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 2301) 0% 22% ± 0%
Sapphire(1DA2 E344) 0% 23% ± 4%
Asus(1043 052B) 0% 24% ± 0%
Device(7333 0000) 0% 25% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 A560) 0% 25% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical RX 560 Builds (Compare 37,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - €64

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: €421

Popular RX 560 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 3 years ago.

Excellent

1 day ago.

Jjxj


Good

2 months ago.

Normal people dont post comments or "reviews", why would they? Only company plebs trying to sell sh** do that. Took me a few stings to figure it out. Gotta give the AMD "fanboys" 10/10 for hard work, they are all over it - HOOYA


Excellent

1 day ago.

uyee


Good

2 months ago.

Was able to get one on a budget, able to run most of my owned games at 60+fps on highs while having open drivers to run all of it on Linux.


Good

6 days ago.

Best new performance for the money


Excellent

7 months ago.

its perfect for most of the game i like it very much i dont selected i love it cuz there are better gpu's


Good

26 days ago.

a


Excellent

11 months ago.

because im stuck with it and it runs games at descent frame rates


Good

2 months ago.

Best card for playing low end games.


Good

1 month ago.

Esta muy nice me corre r6 igual csgo y fortnite en dos pantallas


Good

6 months ago.

I have two of these ladies set up in crossfire and they play every game I like just fine on virtual super resolution when slightly overclocked. They work really well with my AOC freesync monitor @75hz, and the temperature stay well below 50 celcius. I'm happy.


Good

10 days ago.

In its time an excellent price-performance ratio. I've been able to play many of modern games in lower details


Good

1 month ago.

I already used. It's so good for people who didn't have enough money, It's so cheap here in Thailand.


Terrible

4 days ago.

I like it because it gives more fps and its just some dollors more than the other


Excellent

3 months ago.

its overprized for how bad it is


Good

22 months ago.

One of the best video cards! Reccomend buying to everyone


Excellent

14 months ago.

it seems to do what it wants when it comes to fps, like on rust for instance, Yesterday i was getting 50 - 70 fps. Now today im getting an unplayable 13 fps, and idk how to fix it


Good

3 years ago.


Excellent

4 months ago.

it's an awesome budget GPU and it plays games like gaming Nvidia cards but at a cheaper price


Terrible

3 years ago.

low perfomance


Average

12 months ago.

I don't think about buying this GPU as i suggested spending a little bit more for a much more powerful RX 570 4GB instead. Offered weaker performance than GTX 1050 while requiring significantly more power which makes this GPU a poor choice for those who just want to upgrade GPU or are building the new computer.


Poor

17 months ago.

Just get a RX 550 if you want light gaming.


Poor

8 months ago.

My brother was forced to purchase this during the height of the mining craze. I wouldn't advise you to purchase this, as these days there are many great performers for just a little bit more cash. It runs older games at decent settings, but newer ones... SWBF2 at 720p w/ Low crashes constantly.


Excellent

3 years ago.

no lag +++++price


Terrible

2 years ago.

This card, at its high price, costs MORE than the GTX 1050, and is still slower and worse! Don't buy RX cards if you want the "best bang for your buck."


Good

2 years ago.

The low profile version is ok some how nice and compact very nice for those very small builds. : )


Excellent

15 months ago.

good for new games!


Your
opinion?
649 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K €192Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) €241Crucial MX500 250GB €36
Intel Core i5-9400F €137Nvidia RTX 3080 €602Samsung 850 Evo 120GB €95
Intel Core i5-10600K €243Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) €469Samsung 860 Evo 250GB €35
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) €38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB €57SanDisk Extreme 64GB €62
WD Blue 1TB (2012) €36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB €65SanDisk Extreme 32GB €44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) €148G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB €639SanDisk Extreme 16GB €24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback
Cookies help us deliver a better site. By using our site, you agree to our use of cookies.  Learn more   Got it